Must Reads
What is a ‘Must Read’ for those interested in medical education?
Each month, we identify 3-4 noteworthy articles from the health professions education literature and label them as “must reads.” Selection is based on several criteria including originality and methodological rigor. Our process includes a formal search of the peer-reviewed literature, screening titles and abstracts, full text review, and an editorial meeting to achieve consensus.
Who are we and why are we doing this?
Our reviewers include individuals with expertise in teaching, educational oversight, and research as well as those who are beginning their careers as educational scholars.
The volume of health professions education articles has become overwhelming. In curating some of the best new published papers, we hope to make it easier for all of us to keep abreast of cutting edge educational scholarship and practices.
We’d welcome involvement in the selection process. Reviewers can earn CME credit and contribute to Must Reads research. If you are interested in supporting this work or have perspectives to share, please email Sean Tackett: stacket1@jhmi.edu.
You can also follow @MedEdMustReads on X (aka Twitter) to be notified when new must read articles are selected and sign up to receive an email each month.
(Current Reviewers: Kara Alcegueire, Paul Bain, Kavita Chapla, Scott Kinkade, Andrew Klein, Viviane Liao, Erica Lin, Liju Mathew, Pallavi Menon, Amin Nakhostin-Ansari, Bridget O’Brien, Ashley Paul, Julianne Perretta, Katherine Senko, Julia Shalen, Kiara Smith, Sean Tackett, Scott Wright)
Featured This Month
The GIst
• Sensemaking was cyclical with 3 steps: (1) framing a clinical problem, (2) inquiring into it, and (3) taking action.
WHY THIS IS A MUST READ
Clinical situations are full of ambiguity. Clinical sensemaking’s focus on how learners assign meaning to clinical information and arrive at concrete next steps can be useful for education and additive to models for diagnostic and management reasoning.
The GIst
• Pluses included better worker rights and benefits and opportunities for advocacy and leadership; minuses included taking positions against the program and being in conflict with some accreditation requirements.
WHY THIS IS A MUST READ
Residents’ roles as both practicing healthcare workers and learners in educational programs create tensions in the U.S. While residents should be actively engaged by all programs and institutions, unionizing may add credibility when residents advocate for improvements in care.
The Gist
• Summarized 5 theories and implications for clinical reasoning teaching, assessment, errors, and research.
WHY THIS IS A MUST READ
Clinical reasoning is complex and relates to many existing theories. This article’s brief description of each theory and final model may enable learners and educators to better apply theory to practice.
Featured
The Gist
• Identified 3 major discourses - EHRs represented: (1) skills to be learned, (2) systems that coordinated care, and/or (3) cognitive processes (e.g., clinical reasoning).
WHY THIS IS A MUST READ
The Gist
• Pilot tested 35 items with 177 medical students to demonstrate proof-of-concept.
WHY THIS IS A MUST READ
The Gist
• Characterized 3 clusters as “Healthy-flourishers,” “Getting-By,” and “At-Risk.”
WHY THIS IS A MUST READ
The Gist
• Failing to greet students led to a sense of rejection, worsened confidence, and impaired learning.
WHY THIS IS A MUST READ
The Gist
• Physicians learned primarily through clinical situations with limited individualized feedback; formal learning activities and requirements were less helpful.
WHY THIS IS A MUST READ
The Gist
• Identified 12 interventions with new thematic content, including the first for identity formation, and summarized findings across 86 studies and 121 interventions.