Must Reads
What is a ‘Must Read’ for those interested in medical education?
Each month, we identify 3-4 noteworthy articles from the health professions education literature and label them as “must reads.” Selection is based on several criteria including originality and methodological rigor. Our process includes a formal search of the peer-reviewed literature, screening titles and abstracts, full text review, and an editorial meeting to achieve consensus.
Who are we and why are we doing this?
Our reviewers include individuals with expertise in teaching, educational oversight, and research as well as those who are beginning their careers as educational scholars.
The volume of health professions education articles has become overwhelming. In curating some of the best new published papers, we hope to make it easier for all of us to keep abreast of cutting edge educational scholarship and practices.
We’d welcome involvement in the selection process. Reviewers can earn CME credit and contribute to Must Reads research. If you are interested in supporting this work or have perspectives to share, please email Sean Tackett: stacket1@jhmi.edu.
You can also follow @MedEdMustReads on X (aka Twitter), follow the must reads page on LinkedIn, and/or sign up to receive an email each month if you want to be updated on new must reads selections.
(Current Reviewers: Mohammad Aldalou, Syed Muhammad Ali, Paul Bain, Elie Dargham, Suni Ebby, Mohammad Kabakibi, Anisha Kshetrapal, Liju Mathew, Amin Nakhostin-Ansari, Ashley Paul, Julianne Perretta, Katherine Senko, Sean Tackett, Scott Wright, Tony Zhu)
Featured This Month
The Gist
• Trainees (1) avoided proposing an independent plan by anticipating supervisor preferences, (2) assumed reasons for supervisor changes, or (3) asked for explanations.
Why This is a Must Read
There are often many good ways to handle a clinical situation, and much can be learned from exploring clinical grey zones. This article reminds us to openly discuss decision-making, and it provides tips to use in practice.
The Gist
• The ABCD intervention group had greater AI self-efficacy and clinical decision quality.
Why This is a Must Read
AI is everywhere now, but there are few systematic approaches for using AI in medical education and practice. This article provides evidence for a framework that has promise for use in other programs.
The Gist
• Gossip could lead to formal feedback, help make sense of feedback that was received, or serve as feedback.
Why This is a Must Read
Talking about others when they’re not around can generate helpful perspectives. This article highlights that gossip should not remain hidden but be applied constructively to improve learning and performance.
Featured
The Gist
• Argues that adaptive learning, managing uncertainty, and moral imagination require creative thinking.
Why This is a Must Read
The Gist
• Identified value in 5 domains: (1) individual relationships, (2) operational quality, (3) financial returns, (4) societal impacts, and (5) strategic alignment.
Why This is a Must Read
The Gist
• Describes workplace and teammate factors that facilitate or impede multidisciplinary team function.
Why This is a Must Read
The Gist
• Recommends trainees show that they can write clinical notes without AI, receive teaching about AI scribe technology, and use AI documentation to prompt reflection and feedback.
Why This is a Must Read
The Gist
• The warning did not make a difference, although students did not switch their answers often.
Why This is a Must Read
The Gist
• Keys included motivation to improve, seeking feedback and professional development opportunities, and being responsive to changes in learning needs and contexts.