Must Reads
What is a ‘Must Read’ for those interested in medical education?
Each month, we identify 3-4 noteworthy articles from the health professions education literature and label them as “must reads.” Selection is based on several criteria including originality and methodological rigor. Our process includes a formal search of the peer-reviewed literature, screening titles and abstracts, full text review, and an editorial meeting to achieve consensus.
Who are we and why are we doing this?
Our reviewers include individuals with expertise in teaching, educational oversight, and research as well as those who are beginning their careers as educational scholars.
The volume of health professions education articles has become overwhelming. In curating some of the best new published papers, we hope to make it easier for all of us to keep abreast of cutting edge educational scholarship and practices.
We’d welcome involvement in the selection process. Reviewers can earn CME credit and contribute to Must Reads research. If you are interested in supporting this work or have perspectives to share, please email Sean Tackett: stacket1@jhmi.edu.
You can also follow @MedEdMustReads on X (aka Twitter) to be notified when new must read articles are selected and sign up to receive an email each month.
(Current Reviewers: Kara Alcegueire, Paul Bain, Suni Ebby, Vyasa Hari, Scott Kinkade, Pranav Kotamraju, Viviane Liao, Liju Mathew, Milad Memari, Amin Nakhostin-Ansari, Ashley Paul, Julianne Perretta, Katherine Senko, Julia Shalen, Grace Suh, Sean Tackett, Scott Wright, Tony Zhu)
Featured This Month

The Gist
• Compares 5 strategies: (1) principled negotiation, (2) appreciative inquiry, (3) restorative justice, (4) engaging learners as leaders, and (5) applying principles of professional resistance.
Why This is a Must Read
Medical education needs continuous change to stay aligned with healthcare needs, and learner perspectives are key to this process. This article can help reframe acts that seem to challenge authority into opportunities for dialogue and improvement.

The Gist
• Summarizes 6 content areas and 5 educational methods from published studies.
Why This is a Must Read
All physicians will make mistakes and need support when they do. This article can guide programs to help learners respond to difficult emotions that come with making an error.

The Gist
• Outlines the processes and outcomes of 4 workshops and suggests 5 principles for educational co-production with patients, educators, and students.
Why This is a Must Read
While most agree that patient and student perspectives should be incorporated into curriculum design, there are few examples to follow. This article’s detailed examples and general principles can help translate co-production from theory to practice.
Featured

The Gist
• Describes 4 problems created by focusing on wellness - (1) creates work-life antagonism, (2) encourages avoidance of adversity, (3) ignores moral dimensions, and (4) overemphasizes individuals over communities - which could be addressed by more holistic thinking.
Why This is a Must Read

The Gist
• Students used P&C effectively in simulated scenarios and began using it in new contexts.
Why This is a Must Read

The Gist
• Provides historical context and compares (1) fairness, (2) inclusion, and (3) justice orientations, then suggests future directions.
Why This is a Must Read

The Gist
• Describes eight steps, including formulating learning objectives, developing cases with student input, and revising cases based on evaluation data.
Why This is a Must Read

The Gist
• Identified 18 codes across individual, relational, organizational, and societal levels that showed challenges when incorporating individual identities with group norms.
Why This is a Must Read

The Gist
• Empathy increased in pre-clinical years and was maintained during clinical rotations.