Must Reads
What is a ‘Must Read’ for those interested in medical education?
Each month, we identify 3-4 noteworthy articles from the health professions education literature and label them as “must reads.” Selection is based on several criteria including originality and methodological rigor. Our process includes a formal search of the peer-reviewed literature, screening titles and abstracts, full text review, and an editorial meeting to achieve consensus.
Who are we and why are we doing this?
Our reviewers include individuals with expertise in teaching, educational oversight, and research as well as those who are beginning their careers as educational scholars.
The volume of health professions education articles has become overwhelming. In curating some of the best new published papers, we hope to make it easier for all of us to keep abreast of cutting edge educational scholarship and practices.
We’d welcome involvement in the selection process. Reviewers can earn CME credit and contribute to Must Reads research. If you are interested in supporting this work or have perspectives to share, please email Sean Tackett: stacket1@jhmi.edu.
You can also follow @MedEdMustReads on X (aka Twitter) to be notified when new must read articles are selected and sign up to receive an email each month.
(Current Reviewers: Kara Alcegueire, Paul Bain, Kavita Chapla, Scott Kinkade, Pranav Kotamraju, Viviane Liao, Erica Lin, Liju Mathew, Pallavi Menon, Amin Nakhostin-Ansari, Bridget O’Brien, Ashley Paul, Julianne Perretta, Katherine Senko, Julia Shalen, Sean Tackett, Scott Wright)
Featured This Month
The Gist
• Described 3 themes: (1) equality is not necessary for effective partnership, (2) partnership means feeling valued, and (3) value can be shown multiple ways.
WHY THIS IS A MUST READ
Patient perspectives should be represented throughout healthcare. This study integrated multiple points of view to propose a “Wheel of Patient Partnerships” to guide patient involvement in health professions education.
The Gist
• Smaller groups, more time, and teacher motivation (not teacher experience) were correlated with ratings of quality by students.
WHY THIS IS A MUST READ
Bedside teaching is a mainstay of high-quality clinical instruction. This study suggests approaches that may improve student perceptions and experiences.
The GIst
• Contrasts “clock time” – linear and measured objectively - with “event time” – flexible and subjective – and considers implications for medical education.
WHY THIS IS A MUST READ
Time is not experienced the same way by everyone. This article prompts us to be more thoughtful and intentional in how we manage time in medical education and practice.
Featured
The GIst
• Board exam scores, not milestones ratings, were associated with improved patient outcomes.
WHY THIS IS A MUST READ
The GIst
• Describes 4 common plotlines: (1) Journeyperson, (2) Hero’s Quest, (3) Solo Journeyer, and (4) Endless Struggle.
WHY THIS IS A MUST READ
The GIst
• Grading and remediation practices varied and were inconsistently reported to residency programs.
WHY THIS IS A MUST READ
The GIst
• Sensemaking was cyclical with 3 steps: (1) framing a clinical problem, (2) inquiring into it, and (3) taking action.
WHY THIS IS A MUST READ
The GIst
• Pluses included better worker rights and benefits and opportunities for advocacy and leadership; minuses included taking positions against the program and being in conflict with some accreditation requirements.
WHY THIS IS A MUST READ
The Gist
• Summarized 5 theories and implications for clinical reasoning teaching, assessment, errors, and research.